ATA Trapper Talk
November 15, 2019, 08:00:16 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: 2019 TRAPPERS WORKSHOP OCT. 25-27
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: U.S. SENATE COMMITTEE APPROVES BIPARTISIAN SPORTSMEN'S ACT  (Read 2242 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Wayne Watson
Administrator
Trapper
*****

Karma: +22/-9
Offline Offline

Age: 61
Location: Springdale, AR
Posts: 1882


ATA President


View Profile
« on: January 28, 2016, 05:22:36 PM »

NTA ALERT
U.S. SENATE COMMITTEE APPROVES BIPARTISIAN SPORTSMEN'S ACT
 
The Bipartisan Sportsmen's Act of 2016 has passed out of committee and now it is up to us to do everything we can to see that it gets passed.
 
The Bills that make up The Bipartisan Sportsmen's Act include the most critical items for the hunting and conservation community. This includes a key provision sponsored by Sen. John Barrasso (R- Montana) directing the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to remove gray wolves from the Endangered Species List. Despite greatly exceeding population targets for delisting, anti-hunting groups have, for years, successfully used the Federal Courts to keep wolves protected.
 
The Act revises a variety of existing programs to expand access opportunities for hunting, fishing, and recreational shooting. The bill would require land under the jurisdiction of the Bureau of Land Management or the Forest Service must by default, be open for hunting, fishing, and recreational shooting unless the managing agency finds cause to close the land. The language will protect hunting and increase hunting access on millions of acres of public land. Perhaps most importantly, trapping would be included under the definition of "hunting" for the first time in Federal Law.
 
The attempt by Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ) to include a ban on trapping on the 150 million-acre National Wildlife Refuge System failed after committee members received a deluge of emails and letters from trappers, the fur industry and state wildlife agencies
 
The committee also rejected an attempt by Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-California) to remove language preventing the EPA from regulating lead in ammunition.
 
Sen. Boxer is a regular opponent of pro-hunting measures. She has committed to publicly fight the Bipartisan Sportsmen's Act on the floor, and is seeking to organize a filibuster.
 
Sportsmen calls are needed immediately.
 
Please contact both your Senators and encourage them to support the Bipartisan Sportsmen's Act of 2016. You can find the contact information for your Senators at http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm
Logged

Trappersec
Administrator
Trapper
*****

Karma: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Location: Mulberry, Ar
Posts: 15


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: February 03, 2016, 07:05:46 AM »

Thanks Wayne!

I was just fixing to post this from an email I received.  I encourage all sportsmen to contact their representatives in Washington insisting that
they support this bill.   Pew Pew Pew
Logged
Arkiefur
Trapper
****

Karma: +4/-0
Offline Offline

Age: 72
Location: Shady, Ar. near Mena
Posts: 281


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: February 04, 2016, 03:00:16 PM »

Just did my part!! Thumbs Up!
Logged
Danny N
Trapper
*

Karma: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Location: Chickalah arkansas
Posts: 23



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: October 20, 2016, 07:11:57 PM »

like a Senator of New Jersey gott to have something to say about fishing or huting or trapping  Blah, blah, blah Blah, blah, blah Blah, blah, blah Blah, blah, blah
Logged
Trav821
Administrator
Trapper
*****

Karma: +41/-2
Offline Offline

Age: 35
Location: Van buren ar
Posts: 666


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: October 20, 2016, 09:25:23 PM »

Currently new jersey is facing law change that will remove the use of the dog proof trap.

So theres that........
Logged
OutdoorVoodoo
Trapper
*

Karma: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Location: LA-Lower Arkansas
Posts: 24



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: October 21, 2016, 11:54:36 AM »

Have any of you heard any effects the Resilient Forest Act (HR2647) could have on us?
Logged
Trav821
Administrator
Trapper
*****

Karma: +41/-2
Offline Offline

Age: 35
Location: Van buren ar
Posts: 666


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: October 21, 2016, 12:48:53 PM »

I have read it and also listened to westermann on the subject. If theres cause for concern i dont see it. A great majority of the us forestry funds are used to put out fires. Not many in our state. But that takes from the total yearly budget that could be going to  arkansas to improve and grow forest, protecting watersheds in the state. Better habitat = healtier populations for us to trap, hunt, observe etc.
It will give forest service more power, which if its a concern for you youll not agree with.
I am not a forester, those that oppose this seem to think beetles that kill trees and lay arent a tinder bundle. And fires are caused by sweeping winds, and are in fear of over harvest.....
« Last Edit: October 21, 2016, 10:08:37 PM by Trav821 » Logged
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.13 | SMF © 2006-2011, Simple Machines LLC
Simple Audio Video Embedder
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!